Banner

Articles

The Geology of Climate Change

E-mail Print PDF

“It be exceeding rare for geologists to embrace climate change.”

by Geoff Ebbs and Giovanni Ebono

As world opinion divides, irrationally, into climate change believers and deniers a number of anomalies occur which ought to tell us something about both camps.

These key differences include facts such as “Climate change scientists are being protected by security forces as death threats against them become increasingly common. No death threats have been reported against climate change deniers.”

Read more...
 

My Maruti

E-mail Print PDF

My MarutiI own the Maruti, known in Australia as a Suzuki Alto, and I’m proud of it.

The cheapest new car in the Australian market, and the least expensive to run, it is also a zippy runabout which I have used to commute from Brisbane to Northern NSW for two years. It comfortably sits on 130km an hour on the freeway and will wind up to 150 with two passengers on board except up hills.

 

Last Updated ( Saturday, 28 May 2011 10:26 ) Read more...
 

Water industry set to repeat Telstra's mistakes

E-mail Print PDF

The current kerfuffle about the separation of the infrastructure and retail services in Telstra is a timely warning for energy and water privatisation programs.

In 1994, Stewart Fist and myself – writing as Geoff Ebbs – both had weekly columns in the Australian newspaper and called for that separation as a fundamental plank in any telecommunications strategy. We were considered radical ratbags and dismissed as having no real grasp of the economics of major infrastructure corporations. (Other ratbag ideas that I promoted at the time include resource taxes, social networking and timeshifted media.) Some of Stewart’s columns are still on line at http://www.abc.net.au/http/sfist/

Read more...
 

Five myths about the Murray Darling Basin Plan

E-mail Print PDF

The debate about the Murray Darling Basin has become a political football with a level of hysteria that is driven by a largely ignorant media. These five false beliefs about the basin and water allocation have been promoted by people with vested interests to confuse the media and skew the debate. If everyone talking to the media takes the time to explain why these lies are not to be repeated the debate will gradually shift to more moderate and constructive ground.

Read more...
 

EU nuclear waste disposal plans 'not safe' claim scientists.

E-mail Print PDF

EU nuclear waste disposal plans 'not safe' claim scientists

Emily Shelton

16th September 2010

Experts warn EU proposals for deep geological disposal of radioactive waste have ‘serious potential for something to go badly wrong’

There are ‘serious flaws’ in the advice being given to EU ministers on disposing of nuclear waste deep underground, scientists have concluded.

Geological disposal, where radioactive waste is buried in rock formations underground, is the preferred approach of a number of European countries, with potential sites having already been identified in Finland, Sweden and the UK, in Cumbria.

However, scientists and environmentalists have revealed 'serious flaws in the advice being given to the Commission' and are calling for more research into alternative options.

A major review of the science surrounding deep geological disposal, commissioned by Greenpeace, has highlighted numerous risks of failure which could result in highly radioactive waste being released into our groundwater or seas for centuries. Problems include: corrosion of containers; heat and gas formation leading to pressurisation and cracking of the storage chamber; unexpected chemical reactions; geological uncertainties; future ice ages, earthquakes and human interference.

Report author Dr Helen Wallace says people need to ‘grasp the enormity of the challenge’.

‘We’re talking about trying to contain this waste for a greater amount of time than human beings have been living on the planet, so although [we] might be able to predict the consequences over a short time scale, that’s an enormous scientific challenge’.

‘This waste is extremely radioactive and very hot so it’s going to significantly change the water flow deep underground; the corrosion of materials and the repository will release large quantities of gas which have to escape somehow.’ She warned the waste will ‘remain dangerous for many generations’.

Recent proposals from the EU’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) and the European ‘Implementing Geological Disposal’ Technology Platform (IGD-TP) claim there is a scientific consensus in support of deep geological disposal but Dr Wallace suggests this consensus is a ‘political rather than scientific one’.

The EU Commission is expected to publish a draft nuclear waste plan this autumn with ambitions for the first geological disposal facilities for nuclear waste to be ready by 2025.

Greenpeace is calling on EU leaders to look at alternatives, such as near surface or above ground storage or deep bore holes. Storing waste above ground was seen by Dr Wallace as the 'least bad option' because corrosion and leaking could be prevented.

Useful links
Greenpeace report ‘Rock Solid?'
Vision Document of the European ‘Implementing Geological Disposal’ Technology Platform (IGD-TP)

 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  10 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
Page 1 of 489

`One of the great things about America, one of the beauties of our country, is that when we see a young, innocent child blown up by an IED, we cry.'

GWBush - Washington, D.C., Mar. 29, 2006