Banner

Articles

Kevin Rudd's population policy already decided?

E-mail Print PDF
Media Release - Kevin Rudd’s population policy already decided? - 5 April 2010      
Written by Sandra Kanck   
Wednesday, 14 April 2010 08:37

5 April 2010

 
Kevin Rudd’s population policy already decided?
 
National environment group, Sustainable Population Australia (SPA) says that comments made by the Prime Minister in announcing the creation of a Population Ministry all but guarantee a skewed outcome for the government’s population policy inquiry.
 
“While welcoming the creation of the new portfolio, SPA wonders why it took the government so long to recognise that it was needed,” says Sandra Kanck, President of SPA.
 
“But as a consequence of other comments made at the time of the announcement SPA has concerns about the policy that will be developed.
 
“Opinion polls show that a majority of Australians want to stop wanton population growth and believe we have neither the water or infrastructure to support Kevin Rudd’s ‘big Australia’.
 
“The Prime Minister has become a mite sensitive to this sort of feedback and is now attempting to show that he is listening, but who is he listening to?
Read more...  

UN considers review of alleged carbon offset abuses.

E-mail Print PDF

UN considers review of alleged carbon offset abuses

Clean Development Mechanism carbon offset scheme faces fresh criticism over dubious emission reduction projects 

Ozone hole over Antarctica A Nasa graphic showing the extent of the ozone hole over Antarctica - critics of the UN's carbon offsetting scheme say it is increasing ozone-depleting chemicals.

The UN has confirmed that it is considering a formal review of its Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) after a new report leveled fresh criticism at the high profile carbon offsetting scheme.

A coalition of green groups working under the banner CDM Watch yesterday tabled a formal request calling on the UN's climate change secretariat to overhaul the CDM and crack down on alleged "gaming" of the system that has allowed some firms to benefit from increasing their greenhouse gas emissions.

Read more...
 

Nuclear Fusion Projects Worries EU

E-mail Print PDF

(NB Do not confuse this with Nuclear Fission).

Nuclear Fusion Projects Worries EU

June 09, 2010

A funding battle is brewing in Europe over a 16-billion-euro ($21.5 billion) experiment to crack the puzzle of commercialising nuclear fusion - the process that powers the sun.


 The European Union's executive arm is trying to coordinate an extra contribution of 1.4 billion euros in 2012-2013 from EU member countries, whose finances have been crippled by the economic crisis.

 

Many environmentalists say the cost of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) project is out of control and money would be better spent on low-carbon projects such as home insulation which also create millions of jobs. ITER's backers argue it has the potential to change the course of history and needs unwavering commitment.

Read more...
 

Asia's silent victoms of pollution and emissions.

E-mail Print PDF

Asia's silent victims of pollution and emissions

The global south is struggling with industrial emissions, always playing catch up in a bid to fix the ailments it has created

 

Pollution in China : Smoke billows from chimneys at a chemical factory in Shangrao, Jiangxi Countries such as China can become victims of their own industrial success with the pollution that it creates. Photograph: Stringer Shanghai/Reuters

I recently got stuck in a snarl up near the turnoff for Vientiane's airport. I saw a young man's body being peeled off the road. The police did not clean up before letting traffic flow again, so I drove queasily through the remaining blood and brains and was haunted onto the flight to Bangkok. Judging by the mess, both he and the truck that hit him were travelling at high speed. That it was early afternoon did not preclude either him or the driver of the truck from being drunk. He was one of an estimated 1.7 million annual road fatalities, 70-90% of which happen in the global south.

Read more...
 

UK population growth needs to be reversed

E-mail Print PDF

UK population growth needs to be reversed

Ecologist

9th June, 2010

Sustainability watchdog argues for an end to larger family tax benefits and a bigger political debate on reducing population growth and its impact

Population growth is not just a 'poor world' problem and needs to be reversed in the UK too, says sustainability NGO Forum for the Future.

The UK's population is forecast by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) to increase from 61.4 million today to 70.6 million by 2030.

Forum for the Future says that whilst a population of 70 million is not inherently unsustainable, managing that level of population sustainably will require an 'extraordinary combination of planning, investment, and innovation'.

In a new paper, 'Growing pains: population and sustainability in the UK', the group says that the UK should aim to reduce that growth and its impact through more targeted family planning and an end to GDP-led growth.

'Most classical economic theory still supports the expansion of population as a means of creating an economic surplus. This analysis is now dangerously outdated because classical economics has ignored the 'boundary conditions' set on the economy by the ecological and physical limits of the planet.

'We should, therefore, aim for the redefinition of human well-being and quality of life in terms of a much broader basket of economic, social and ecological factors,' the report says.

Reform family benefits


One key recommendation is to reform tax benefit policies so as not to encourage larger families.

'Current tax structures and family leave structures give us a system where taxpayers and employers have effectively agreed to provide continually increasing levels of support for a family of any size (e.g. tax credits, tax-beneficial childcare vouchers and increases in statutory maternity pay).

'There would clearly be very difficult issues in reframing these benefits whilst creating a family-friendly society where no child is in poverty, but government may need to rethink the direction of incentives.'

The report also supports proposals to raise the retirement age to 66 in 2016 to shift attitudes away from seeing older people as a burden, as well as allowing people to 'rethink how to spread work, take time out for rearing children or caring for family or for learning throughout our lives'.

It says the obsession with immigration is wrong, and while limiting it would help to reduce UK population growth and associated impacts, it would have no impact on the global population picture.

Useful links

Growing pains: population and sustainability in the UK

 
Page 9 of 487

Tease

 

Download it to print or view on screen

Sick of Swine flu?